Spendthrift Sunday: Real Simple: Really Not
Posted by Lise on 20 Jan 2008 at 08:38 pm | Tagged as: voluntary simplicity
In my hand I hold the December 2007 issue of Real Simple. At roughly $5 a pop, it’s not a magazine I frequently buy. Or ever, really. But back in November, I was stuck in the Cleveland airport for an ungodly amount of time, returning from a business trip, and I decided to pick up a copy. I’d been meaning to take a deeper look at this magazine, which at first glance struck me as not particularly real or simple. I figured that, if nothing else, my $5 investment would net me a good Spendthrift Sunday article.
I was not disappointed.
First of all, like many magazines, it’s in large part ads. 215 of the magazine’s 396 pages contained ads – most of those 215 ads were whole-page or multiple page ads. That’s right – 55% of the magazine was advertising. This is not counting the inside back and front covers, which were also ads; or the fact that most of the articles, were, in fact, product recommendations. Let’s take a look at some of these articles:
“How sweet it is” gives details on holding a cookie decorating party. This party is incomplete, of course, without bakery boxes ($1.30 a pop), copper cookie cutters ($13 a pop), and for that very special holiday cheer, Wilton cookie icing ($4.50).
“Your days are numbered,” a feature on using your calendar effectively, featuring ‘Real Simple picks’ such as a $31 “6-inch personal pocket journal.” But wait! It can be embossed! And has city maps!
“Black magic,” a fashion spread of “little black dresses” – including one for $1,130, and several in the $400-700 range.
Let us not forget the ever-helpful “Real Simple To-Do” list at the back (2 1/2 pages), which offers a handy-dandy guide to all the advertisements found within the pages. This is followed by another four pages of “Simply shopping,” with even more items to lust after, such as a device to “scan, read, and organize” your receipts. Because I guess, if you’re reading this magazine and buying $1,000 dresses, you need to be clipping coupons, amirite?
In case you’re wondering who is behind this drivel, look no farther than Steve Sachs, the publisher of Real Simple. Apparently he’s been quite good for the company. Of course, some of the articles about him highlight what Real Simple is really about:
One of Sachs’s biggest successes has come in an area that most consumer marketers are finding difficult to tap into: Partnership marketing. As Real Simple’s consumer marketing director, Sachs oversaw the development of partnerships with companies such as Coca-Cola, Pottery Barn, and Whole Foods-partnerships that netted the magazine more than 200,000 new subs.
Partnership marketing. Who is profiting from my $5 “investment” in this rag? Not only Steve Sachs, apparently, but Coca-Cola, Pottery Barn, Whole Foods, and others. Unsurprisingly, you find advertisements for all three of these in the pages of December 2007′s issue.
Since I work in advertising, in my own way, I love taglines. Real Simple’s tagline is “life made easier.” This life appears, then, to be a life of unitaskers – a world where no product can stand in for another; where we need exactly the “best product for dry skin,” exactly the right cleaning products from Target, exactly the right cookie icing. However, it is telling that none of these articles say much about where to store your cookie icing when you’re done with it, unless it’s to sell you a cookie icing organizer. It doesn’t mention that you’ll need to dust that new tchotchke, except, perhaps, to recommend an environmentally-unfriendly, non-biodegradable product with which to dust it. The entire magazine is based on the premise that stuff will make your life easier; but doesn’t recognize the kind of escalation that results from this attitude, that ultimately, you will need more stuff to solve the problems the stuff caused in the first place.
Interestingly, the average American doesn’t need to turn to a $5 magazine to tell them how to simplify their lives. Voluntary Simplicity, the seminal work of the VS moment, tells the stories of many individuals who managed to simplify their life. In large part they did it by turning of the stuff machine and tuning out the advertising drivel.
But that isn’t as sexy, and doesn’t sell slick magazines, does it?
Related Posts:
Join In!
- Share your thoughts on this article in the comments.
- Introduce yourself: Make New Friends, But Keep the Old
- Subscribe to the Frugal in the Fruitlands RSS feed to have new articles delivered to you immediately. (What's RSS?)
- Sign up for the Frugal in the Fruitlands email newsletter and receive a free copy of "3 Tips to Shave Over $300 Off Your Monthly Bills (Without Feeling Deprived)."
- Share this article on PFBuzz, del.icio.us, Digg, or StumbleUpon.
a device to “scan, read, and organize” your receipts.
Oddly enough, I was just looking at something akin to this.
But first, a comment that scanning and organizing receipts has _nothing_ to do with clipping coupons, and I found that non sequitur a source of cognitive dissonance.
Ok, on to my thoughts on such a device. Usually these things are actually a sheet feed scanner. I like the notion behind using one of this to scan in all sorts of information. Recipes, newspaper articles, flyers with useful information (calendar of events, etc.), letters or birthday cards. Anything where you want to keep the information. You can then slice, dice, and organize the information so that it works for you, not against you, and you can then rid yourself of the physical embodiment of the information. While books are a physical embodiment I cherish, I have no reason to keep an entire magazine for one article on building a trebuchet, just because that article is not online where I can easily access it. I want to keep recipes handed to me by my mother or grandmother, but don’t have a recipe box. I want to keep copies of financial information ready at hand on the computer, as well as keeping the physical copies safely stored, perhaps in a safety box at the bank.
Not to say there aren’t times when keeping a physical copy of something is a bad thing (books being an excellent example), but I don’t want to keep clutter just to keep information.
word up.
would you be able to link to Voluntary Simplicity? I googled and found a lot of options.
Hi Kate! The book is by Duane Elgin – here’s a link to the revised edition on Amazon.com
scanning and organizing receipts has _nothing_ to do with clipping coupons
Fair enough. I’ll admit I glanced at the advertisement fairly fast.
I can definitely see the merits of a system like that, especially if one is trying to move towards a paperless office. I can even see how it might be useful to me in putting together a price book for groceries – though I wouldn’t be keeping receipts in those cases; I’d just be entering them into the computer and then tossing them.
But I think I’ll stick with low-tech in this particular instance.