Spendthrift Sunday: Pants Don’t Need a Mission Statement.
Posted by Lise on 29 Jul 2007 at 09:30 pm | Tagged as: frugality
Spendthrift Sunday is a new feature designed to highlight one distinctly un-frugal product that we’re being convinced we need.
Fashion is not a luxury, says the strident tagline of Sarah Jessica Parker’s new line of clothing, Bitten.
There was something about the signs that enraged me the moment I saw them, on a visit to the Leominster mall two weeks ago. I saw these ads immediately as the mind control they were: Forget your thousands of dollars of credit card debt, you deserve fashionable clothes, it said to me. Months of staying out of malls has made me keenly aware of the psychology used to part me with my money.
The topic didn’t come to the fore again until my mother visited this past weekend. She had seen the episode of Oprah where Bitten was featured, and thought she might find some clothes for her teaching gig this fall. Apparently the clothes are advertised as fitting a wide range of women.
So to Steve and Barry’s we went. Far be it from me to deny my mother.
The first thing that amused us is that of the Bitten items that were displayed at the front of the store, the XL shirt wouldn’t have fit me, let alone my larger mother. So much for fitting larger bodies. However, the prices were low, low, low.
We were soon to find out why.
In all fairness, there were definitely some styles that caught my eye, and I needed some new pants, so I retreated into the dressing room with a pair of khaki capris with odd ties at the bottom. The poor workmanship of these clothes became evident immediately. “This waistband is fraying,” I remarked, eyeing the “Made in China” label. Maybe it’s supposed to be distressed? Who knows? But the hems were fraying, too, and there were threads coming off all the seams, and the fabric itself was the same cheap, silky synthetic that all the Bitten pants are made out of.
The price for these pants? Fifteen dollars. $15 isn’t much at all for a pair of pants, but I felt like I could buy one of those 1960s paper dresses and be getting a better value for quality.
Visiting the website, I discovered that Bitten has a manifesto – I kid you not. I hope the pants feel empowered by it. “It is every woman’s inalienable right to have a pulled together stylish, confident wardrobe with money left over to live.” Inalienable right? Isn’t that going a little far? I mean, to hell with suffrage, if I can get some cheap clothes, right? Probably the person who made those clothes makes as much in a month as one pair of pants costs – what about their inalienable rights? How do they feel about being stylish and pulled-together?
I guess I can get past the trampling-on of a phrase that is so key to real independence everywhere, but I can’t get past the fact that this is advertising up to its same old tricks. They’re not selling you the clothes, they’re selling you a vision of who you will be when you’ve acquired those clothes. You’ll be “pulled together,” “stylish” (or “pulled together stylish,” if you go by the grammar above), and “confident.” And, assumably, be able to hide behind a toothpick like Sarah Jessica Parker.
The logistics of the manifesto fall apart as soon as you have a real look at the clothes. How can you argue that a pair of pants that’s going to fall apart in a year is worth $15? Here I revert to the wisdom that it is better to have a few high quality, classic pieces, and accessorize on the cheap, than it is to have lots of inexpensive, flimsy clothes. Ten out of ten classy French women would agree!
Admittedly, my own fashion concerns don’t extend beyond, “Do I stink?” and “Are my naughty bits covered?” but I encourage you to do what I did, and walk out of the store without spending a cent. Or don’t walk into it. Your money – your life energy – is better spent elsewhere.
Related Posts:
Join In!
- Share your thoughts on this article in the comments.
- Introduce yourself: Make New Friends, But Keep the Old
- Subscribe to the Frugal in the Fruitlands RSS feed to have new articles delivered to you immediately. (What's RSS?)
- Sign up for the Frugal in the Fruitlands email newsletter and receive a free copy of "3 Tips to Shave Over $300 Off Your Monthly Bills (Without Feeling Deprived)."
- Share this article on PFBuzz, del.icio.us, Digg, or StumbleUpon.
Thanks for this post. I completely agree. Unfortunately, it is often the case that you cannot be thrifty AND responsible in consumption. Most “cheap” clothes are, as you have noted, cheap (both in cost and ethics).
For now, I will wait until I REALLY need pants and buy from a company like Patagonia, etc. It costs a bundle, but I’ll have those pants for years (assuming I keep the same size) and I’m not paying into China’s refusal of fair wages.
Tough thing is, where China is concerned, it is really hard to avoid. Sure, your pants or shoes may not be made in china, but practically everything electronic has some component that was. I found a lovely tea towel at the Boston MFA featuring an embroidered Maine lighthouse. The PLASTIC BAG it came in was, yep, you guessed it…made in China.
Kudos to you for being wise to these marketing slogans and their intended effects, Lise.
Rebecca, I’ve heard great things about the work environment at Patagonia (namely, the “surf’s up” philosophy), so that and your endorsement makes me want to consider them even more. I was looking at their selection of pants and wasn’t sure if they would work well for work clothes, though. Any thoughts?
*sigh* Chinese products are pretty ubiquitous, it’s true. After the pet food recall I remember trying to find a pet food company that didn’t have anything to do with Menu Foods, or specifically, its Chinese affiliate. I ended up going with Wellness, which is a human-grade food, but even they purchase meat from Menu Foods, albeit not the Chinese branch.
[...] Pants don’t need a mission statement [...]
Workmanship is a big deal to me lately, I finally had enough when a blue shirt I bought started getting holes and the bottom would roll up, within 6 months!
Cheesy manifesto to me.
Hi Dawn! Welcome to XORsted. I’ve been reading Frugal for Life for a while, and I hope you’ll enjoy this blog as much as I’ve enjoyed yours (although mine is more broad in scope).
“Inalienable right? Isn’t that going a little far? I mean, to hell with suffrage, if I can get some cheap clothes, right? Probably the person who made those clothes makes as much in a month as one pair of pants costs – what about their inalienable rights? How do they feel about being stylish and pulled-together?”
word!!!
[...] to be. The job of advertising is thus simply to sell intangibles. I’ve talked before about a particular line of clothing and its marketing; but the example that’s on my mind right now is a magazine – Real Simple. It appeals, I [...]
[...] Pants Don’t Need a Mission Statement I wrote about the dangers of buying cheap, poorly made clothes. But here are two examples of when [...]
our Steve and Barry store has everything for $8 most all of the time. and the majority of the time I walk in, try somethng on, and walk out. the cut of the fabric just isn’t good quality either.
i’d rather spend $0.50 on a gently used Express top that my future MIL found at her yuppy thrift store.
[...] Sarah Jessica Parker’s Bitten line can say this, but as I’ve argued, they can’t st…. Allie really means it. She’s all about buying a few quality, classic pieces and [...]